Get Free Ebook Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman
The writer is actually wise to select words to make use of in making this book. The options of words are essential to develop a book. It will appertain to read by such particular societies. But among the developments of this book is that this publication is truly correct for each society. You may not hesitate to know nothing after reading this publication. Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible And Why, By Bart D. Ehrman can help you to discover numerous points after analysis.
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman
Get Free Ebook Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman
The supreme sales letter will offer you a distinct book to conquer you life to much greater. Book, as one of the recommendation to get lots of resources can be taken into consideration as one that will attach the life to the experience to the knowledge. By having book to read, you have aimed to connect your life to be much better. It will encourage your top quality not only for your life but additionally people around you.
As well as to advise you a better book with wonderful top quality, you can pick Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible And Why, By Bart D. Ehrman Why we refer this book for you? We know that you are now looking for the certified publication related to this subject. Hence, you can start it by getting this publication as one of the chosen analysis book. It is not about guide that is written by a very professional author or published by very popular publisher. This is about guide that is favourite one and impact for your requirements.
As pertaining to this referred publication, you may have understood why this book is awaited. However, for you who are still interested of the factors, you will certainly recognize he reasons when you start to check out guide. Looking at the cover of Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible And Why, By Bart D. Ehrman as well as review title will lead you recognize why many people falling in love. Fond of the book that related to the subject you are searching for can make you really feel satisfied. This is what will certainly make you load that wish.
From the explanation above, it is clear that you should review this publication Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible And Why, By Bart D. Ehrman We give the on-line publication entitled Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible And Why, By Bart D. Ehrman right here by clicking the link download. From shared book by online, you can offer a lot more perks for lots of people. Besides, the visitors will be additionally quickly to obtain the preferred publication Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible And Why, By Bart D. Ehrman to review. Discover the most preferred as well as needed publication Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible And Why, By Bart D. Ehrman to review now as well as below.
From Booklist
The popular perception of the Bible as a divinely perfect book receives scant support from Ehrman, who sees in Holy Writ ample evidence of human fallibility and ecclesiastical politics. Though himself schooled in evangelical literalism, Ehrman has come to regard his earlier faith in the inerrant inspiration of the Bible as misguided, given that the original texts have disappeared and that the extant texts available do not agree with one another. Most of the textual discrepancies, Ehrman acknowledges, matter little, but some do profoundly affect religious doctrine. To assess how ignorant or theologically manipulative scribes may have changed the biblical text, modern scholars have developed procedures for comparing diverging texts. And in language accessible to nonspecialists, Ehrman explains these procedures and their results. He further explains why textual criticism has frequently sparked intense controversy, especially among scripture-alone Protestants. In discounting not only the authenticity of existing manuscripts but also the inspiration of the original writers, Ehrman will deeply divide his readers. Although he addresses a popular audience, he undercuts the very religious attitudes that have made the Bible a popular book. Still, this is a useful overview for biblical history collections. Bryce ChristensenCopyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Read more
Review
“Offers a fascinating look into the field of textual criticism and evidence that Scriptures have been altered.” (Charleston Post & Courier)“Whichever side you sit on regarding Biblical inerrancy, this is a rewarding read.” (Dallas Morning News)“One of the unlikeliest bestsellers of the year.” (Washington Post)“Misquoting Jesus is a godsend.” (Philadelphia Inquirer)
Read more
See all Editorial Reviews
Product details
Hardcover: 256 pages
Publisher: HarperOne; Later Printing edition (November 1, 2005)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0060738170
ISBN-13: 978-0060738174
Product Dimensions:
6 x 0.9 x 9 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review:
4.3 out of 5 stars
987 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#44,826 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
The author claims to be a leading authority on the Bible and the subtitle of this book is, "The story behind who changed the Bible and why". Here's are the core problems with this book: 1) The "Bible" wasn't changed; the ancient scriptures were changed by the Church to INVENT the thing we commonly know as "The Bible". 2) Ironically, the author believes in and tells his OWN STORIES—folklore...fairy tales—about "Jesus" that are NOT EVEN IN THE BIBLE. And you KNOW that when someone is on a first-name basis with "Jesus" that they are treating "Jesus" as a real name (which it is known that it is NOT, NOR IS "CHRIST"; they are descriptives)…and a real person…which raises the question: If "Jesus" is a real person and alive and well, why isn't "he" ruling the world instead of the Pope? He admits to being a former evangelical Christian/Bible fundamentalist who studied intensively at the "Moody Bible Institute" and was taught "salvation". Not a good start. There ARE a couple of small redeeming comments in the book, but he is definitely, NOT a "world-class biblical scholar"…only claiming to be…anyone can and does. ADDITIONALLY, my copy is missing text (sentences end in midstream) and repeating text: a very poor way to release a book, "HARPER".
Ehrman argues for two theses, one practical and one more abstract.The practical thesis can be summarized as: We do not possess any of the original writings of the New Testament, and the copies we have are riddled with negligent and/or intentional alterations. Therefore, the New Testament we read today, which is based upon numerous altered copies, is not very close to the original text. And if the original text is the Word of God, the Word of God is lost.The abstract thesis can be summarized as: For any text, both the author's and the reader's subjective beliefs and experiences condition the meaning of the words, and therefore color the interpretation of the text. As a result, there is no such thing as an objectively true interpretation of a text. The search for the "correct" meaning is fruitless. Therefore, no one can claim to know the true meaning of the text of the New Testament.The upshot? The New Testament we read today is of human, and not divine, origin (practical thesis), and, in any event, any claim to "the One True Interpretation" is in principle false (abstract thesis).I will not take a stand on Ehrman's claims but hope I've faithfully outlined them for people deciding whether to purchase the book. I am familiar with but not well-versed in either the New Testament or textual criticism. Nonetheless, I found his arguments and analysis easy to track. The broad historical information was interesting, and the biblical passages he focuses on to illustrate his points are engaging instead of arcane. Some may consider this book anti-religious, but Ehrman's tone is respectful and honest, not polemical. For such a short, accessible book, the reader can gain a lot from reading it.
A well written book about the evolution of the Bible, particularly the New Testament, and how our present text came to be in all its various forms. Dr. Ehrman begins with a brief summary of his own life. From an "ordinary kid" he becomes a fundamentalist Christian believing the Bible to be wholly inspired. During his graduate program in a Christian school he develops an interest in the wide variety of historical documents that have, through many generations come down to us a our present Bible. He becomes, in short, a textual-scholar, and has an epiphany!Ehrman quickly learns that there are no longer any "original texts" anywhere. The earliest texts found, more fragmented the farther back one goes, come from the 2nd century some 100 years after Jesus' death. None of the original Apostles, nor Paul are any longer alive at that point, and what early notes exist for geographically fragmented communities are already copies of lost originals. Even if the literal-original writing was "inspired by God" as fundamentalists claim, by the opening of the 2nd century the earliest copies of these writings have already passed through human hands and the real originals are no more. Except for the Christian community of Alexandria where professional scribes already existed, all of the early copies were made by amateur believers who, as it happened could read and write, and so copied texts for their congregations; sometimes well and sometimes poorly. It was not until late in the 4th century that more professional scribes assumed the copyist role.Roughly the first half of the book is taken up with the history of textual criticism. Ehrman leads us through early (17th century) classification attempts and the techniques developed to determine which texts were "more original" than others. Ehrman notes that in many many cases even that matter cannot be decided with any finality. That the modern obsession with the text began after the Reformation is no accident. Protestant scholars were far more compulsive about the text than Catholics. Protestant theology and doctrine rests entirely on the text, while Catholicism has its priestly class for precisely the task of interpreting the text in what ever form it takes. By the 18th century, scholars had identified some 30,000 textual variations in the manuscripts that come together as the then relatively stabilized New Testament.Most of these variations were simply mistakes made by non-professional copyists. Sometimes they left out a word or whole sentences. Sometimes what there were of literal originals were physically degraded even when first copied. Copyists sometimes had to "fill in the blanks", a smudged word, or a bleed-through from some earlier text on the page for example. So why not go back to the more professional Alexandrian texts and call those "closest to original"? Because while the vast majority of changes were copy errors, not all were merely that. Here and there changes were made for theological and socio-political reasons. In point of fact (something he does not mention) the Alexandrian scholars were among those who, by the early 5th Century, were considered among the heretical sects by the then solidifying Roman Church. Ehrman does not mention is the textual difference between the modern Western (Roman) and Eastern (Greek and Eastern European "Orthodox") churches. His aim is historical, and he does cover the early Greek texts whose alterations became mixed in with all of the others.In the second half of the book Ehrman covers three types of changes made deliberately by one group of copyists or another so as to make the text easier to read and better line up with the various theological opinions and social controversies of the time, each propounded by groups of believers who were doing their own copying! In the end, Ehrman is forced to conclude that even the lost originals were probably not autodidacts (texts dictated by God) because if God had wanted Christians to have his un-corrupted words in perpetuity, He would have made sure the originals survived.I gave the book 5 stars not because the book's subject was of great interest to me, but because Dr. Ehrman does such a marvelous job of treating a scholarly subject (many many references are provided) with easy to read language aimed at non-scholars of the subject like myself.
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman PDF
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman EPub
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman Doc
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman iBooks
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman rtf
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman Mobipocket
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman Kindle
